Skip navigation.
Home

BART's Broke...?

The report is available at

www.BARTbudgetWaste.org

Among the highlights in the report:
The top eighteen BART executives profiled in the report received a combined total of $3,462,381.80 in fiscal year 2008.

$396,798.95 in “other” pay was awarded to the top eighteen BART executives in 2008 – this pay is in addition to their base salary.

Top earners at the BART executive office in 2008 include:
Dorothy Dugger, General Manager: $334,856.93 in combined earnings.

Sherwood Wakeman, General Counsel: $252,419.31 in combined earnings.

Matthew Burrows, General Counsel: $234,311.21 in combined earnings.

Marcia deVaughn, Deputy General Manager: $207,258.81 in combined earnings.

Gary Gee, BART Police Chief: $201,255.23 in combined earnings.

Someone told me that all of

Someone told me that all of the vacant positions at BART are being counted as part of their "deficit", i.e. they're including what it would cost if those positions were filled even if they're not. Is that true?

I believe that is correct. A

I believe that is correct.

A vacant position has to be fully funded (in case they do fill it).

So it is counted in the budget.

Actually, that is one of the many places where they hide money.

If they have 140 vacant positions that is 140 times the salary that is setting in the operating budget drawing interest or committed that they can claim can't be spent. If they ever need or want the money they can just chop the positions and suddenly they have money.

We call them rat holes. It is like a funded project that they invent that they know they will never build. They can always set aside money for it and then claim the money is for the project so it can't be spent. But if they need some cash they can chop the project and free up some bucks.

They also cut back on maintenance staff until stuff is falling apart and then declare an emergency due to aging or whatever the excuse of the day is. Then they go to the Feds or State crying that they are broke and abused and get some money thrown at them to contract out the work. Good for them, bad for the economy.

The economy likes a nice steady flow of people working continuously and spending money. When they cut the workforce it cuts people spending money and supporting each other. Starbucks or whoever can't sell cups of coffee to people going to work, restaurants close, plants close, people get laid off, the economy suffers. When the economy suffers, you and I suffer. My Dental plan gets chopped. My kids have crooked teeth and some dental technician gets laid off.

Then we have to do a stimulus deal because all the top brass have mismanaged things so badly that their bonuses aren't coming in. Then there is a real problem!

When we suffer it's a recession. When the bazzilionaires hurt it's an economic crisis!

I would like to say good-bye

I would like to say good-bye to EVERYONE ABOVE. BART will run just fine without ALL OF THEM. Those two general counsels and Dugger should definitely go for the horrible way the Oscar Grant investigation was handled and for taking four months to respond to the allegations. Why does BART need two in-house general counsels and a deputy general manager in addition to Dugger?

Looks like it goes both ways.

Looks like it goes both ways. BART janitors making $28/hour? And they need separate janitors for the inside and outside?

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/05/06/BAJ317F7FM.DTL&hw=bart&sn=001&sc=1000

I believe the outside

I believe the outside "janitor" is their groundskeeper position, and the inside janitor is their system service workers.. Similar to a gardener and the housekeeping staff..

Different jobs depending on how you look at it. But I was told the drip line is where the inside workers and the outside workers don't cross. Like the doors in an office building, outside workers do outside work..

I also found out there is a job called EOL, they are the cleaning staff that cleans the trains. So GroundsKeepers, Train Cleaners and Station Cleaners. I can see how they are different jobs if compared to an office building. Our office cleaning staff would not be expected to do outside work.

Don't believe everything you

Don't believe everything you read.

The Union nor the Workers have the money to get an article like that written.
BART Management does.

The article you link was actually written by two men. Why does it take two people to write one article?

The Drip Line you refer to was created by BART Management. The inside people (System Service) clean inside the stations. The Outside people (Grounds Workers) are actually gardners and grounds keepers who sweep up the debris from the trees and shrubs they maintain.

System Service use mops, brooms, sweepers, buffers etc. and ride the trains from station to station.

The Grounds Workers use gas powered weed wackers, trimmers, chain saws, weed sprayers, repair sprinkler systems and timers and use brooms to clean up plant debris, etc. and maintain that equipment. They drive dump trucks and utility trucks that carry their equipment and are much more than cleaners and thus make more money than the inside System Service Workers.

Touche. So only the grounds

Touche. So only the grounds workers are making $28/hour then? I can't imagine paying someone $28/hour to sweep, mop, and ride trains all day.

Management gets more than

Management gets more than that and they don't even sweep or mop!

Do you know how many of these

Do you know how many of these service and grounds workers BART has on hand? If I were to take a guess and assign a pair of these workers for every 3 stations, then there are about 15 inside and 15 outside workers (43 stations, soon to be 44). At $53,760 annually (at $28/hour) per worker, that comes out to $1.6 million every year. For gardeners and moppers? Are there other responsibilities they have that I'm missing? My high school job working at Del Taco got me $7.15 an hour, no benefits except a free meal for every 8 hour shift I put in. Sounds like I should have just applied to work at BART instead...

Now this doesn't excuse the bonus pay of BART execs. But I don't know if all the blame can be placed on them when there are janitors making $54K, two workers to replace every one seat, and TO's falling asleep/reading a book during the ride... aren't they supposed to be on the look out for obstructions ahead? Grant it, it is much easier to see what workers are (and aren't) doing in public, and harder to find out what goes on at Kaiser.

BART unions BART has five

BART unions
BART has five unions, including AFSCME, which created the BART Budget site listing executive salaries. What the site does not tell you is that AFSCME members are all white collar managers whose cushy jobs are protected by the union. Doesn't make sense to me. After all, weren't unions created to protect against the abuse of workers that was so common in the days of Upton Sinclair's The Jungle? Now, unions like AFSCME exist to protect nothing more than union benefits and union leaders work to preserve their own skins and nothing more. Not a very noble cause in my opinion. The worst part about it is that taxpayer money goes straight into the direct deposit accounts of these union "leaders."

I would challenge you to find

I would challenge you to find any Union Steward that makes any where close to what the top BART Brass make.

Union Leaders pay Union dues as well.

Perhaps what you're having is an issue with is the law and a bout of ignorance.

Doctors have Unions, Lawyers have Unions. Even BART itself is a member of several associations (Unions) that lobby (negotiate) for funds (money) for themselves. Even the Government is in Unions (ABAG) (Association of Bay Area Governments). They negotiate block grants, money, funds and benefits for various Government Agencies. Even nations are members of Unions. The United Nations.....The United States of America. Remember the Civil War? Save the Union...? The Union vs the Confederacy...? All that ring a bell. Marriage, the strongest of all bonds is a Union.

Everyone is in some sort of Union. It brings strength, protection and even a commonwealth.

imeanyoufeelme's picture

wow, that was pathetic.

wow, that was pathetic.

There is a story behind how

There is a story behind how AFSCME came about at BART. I was on the periphery of it so I'm qualified to tell it.

In 1995, Richard White was the BART General Manager. He was one of those eastern elite masters degree in public administration grads that I spoke so eloquently about in another union related thread. Good to go to run the waterworks, the sewer authority, or the transit system without any knowledge or experience of the technical details.

He decided BART needed to reorganize which was apparently the in vogue product of business management think tanks at the time.

His reorganization was just a polite term for layoffs.

While layoffs are sometimes necessary in any organization, the way his staff went about it was all wrong. Rumors began to surface about job eliminations about six months before anything was announced officially. Nothing was done to either confirm or deny the rumors. Things were just allowed to fester.

Then the potential job loss victims were called to various conference rooms and lunch rooms and told their jobs were being eliminated. Some mention was made of the possibility of jobs in other departments but nothing detailed was offered. That would come in a few weeks.

This cannot be how they teach layoff technique in business school. You get it over with as quickly as possible. Decide to do it, announce it, and do it, all within a few days.

Ultimately what happened was there were jobs for everybody or monetary incentives to retire for the older employees. As it turned out, this was the plan all along. Somebody just decided that it would just be good management technique to f**k with everybody for a while to show them who was in charge.

The people who found themselves being f**ked with were long time BART middle management employees. Many of them had been with BART since the beginning of service and some had worked for the original carbuilder Rohr or the cars' electrical equipment supplier, Westinghouse before BART opened. These were mostly dedicated individuals.

And before you get on your high horse about cushy white collar jobs, you need to know what you're talking about. The people I knew who were affected by this were the Rolling Stock and Shops (rail vehicle maintenance) level one managers. They were the management supervisors in the repair shops. Their work was often done on off shifts and weekends. The shops can be dirty, noisy, smelly, hot and sometimes hazardous places to be. Many of the level ones had been promoted through the ranks from technician or mechanic through shop foreman and inspector so these were dirt under the fingernails people who knew about real work.

This level of employees had been members of BARTSPA, BART Supervisory and Professionals Association, which was non- striking with I believe some negotiation rights up until this debacle began. Mostly due to the way that the whole thing was handled, many of them decided if this was how it was going to be with the new management, they needed to be better organized and that's when AFSCME 3993 was born at BART, 23 years into its operating life at that point.

You people that want to whine about unions need to turn off the FOX news and go talk to some people who have been in one or worked along side them like I did for 24 years at BART. Either that or please just shut the f**k up about it.

It does not take two workers

It does not take two workers to replace one seat.

Another misrepresentation.

The EOL's (End of the Line Car Cleaners) clean the trains.

If a seat bottom is soiled it unsnapps with velcro and they pull it off and slip a clean cover on.

The Back of the seat is made differently and needs to be taken off with tools to change the seat cover. Some seats even have the pole attached which complicates things. Management designed the seat and they decided that it is a mechanic who has tools not a cleaner. So a mechanic disassymbles the seat back to change the cover and they change it rather than call back the EOL.

Part of the issue here is time. The trains are in and out fast. So the EOL cleans it as fast as possible to get the cars back out in service. The seat back doesn't get as dirty as the bottom for obvious reasons and takes much more time to change out. If the EOL had to stop cleaning to disassymble a seat back, and put it back together the car may never get cleaned.

There are reasons why these things happen like they do. Management manages so it is done the way they set it up to be done. So as usual you have a grain of truth wrapped in layers of lies.

If your yard was 90 miles

If your yard was 90 miles long X 45 miles wide and covered 3 counties and had 400,000 people walk across it everyday it would probably cost you about $1.6 million to clean up the debris left behind from Mickey D's bags, coffee cups, people urinating on your front porch, pidgeon poop, dead pidgeons, dead people, robbers, muggers, flashers, heart attack victims, people throwing up, bleeding,etc.........

did I leave anything out....? Well you get my drift. This is not an easy thing that we do. It's simple when someone wants to tear it apart but when we put it all together and make it run, it gets a little complicated.

The real issue has not changed in years. It's about money and getting people to work for cheap. We all shop at the same stores, buy the same cars and ride the same Transit system. Why would a burger cost $5 and gas cost anywhere from $2.50 tp 3.50 per gallon and janitors cost what they cost back in 1952? Nothing is cheap these days.

Also, don't forget about 7

Also, don't forget about 7 years ago BART reduced the cleaning staff alot when they closed restrooms.. I disagree that they have to many. There was an immediate noticable change in the condition of the stations and trains and how often things got cleaned up unless it was a bad mess. The worker at walnut creek says it's not uncomon for them to have to clean 3 or more stations and that Restrooms and elevators are the bigges part.

imeanyoufeelme's picture

but people's perceived

but people's perceived "rights" as to standard of living have changed. A janitor does not have a "right" to own a luxury automobile, plasma tv, or a fat retirement, but people in all manual or unskilled labor fields think they have a right to these luxuries. His work can be completed by anyone, it is unskilled. Obviously the rules are different for technicians, engineers and the such.

Your employer owes you nothing. Salary, benefits and the such are incentives to come and work for the employer. They are meant to get the best they can. Unions thrive on mediocrity and the perceived rights to luxuries.

I get your point, but I don't

I get your point, but I don't think anyone making less than 75K in the bay area is living in luxury.. Most other places yes, that would afford you a heck of a living..

I think NYC is in the same category.

My running joke when you see HWY 4 or 580 backed up in livermore, is that's the "Drive till you qualify" crowd.. People that live 30 minutes plus away from their work and have to drive from places like livermore and tracy to afford a place to live according to their income..

Train Operator since 2003's picture

Hmmm, you have a perspective

Hmmm, you have a perspective that reminds me:

One day the major organs of the human body were deciding which one should be in charge....
While the argument between all the organs was getting heated, the Asshole said quietly; "I believe I should be in charge because I have to deal with the shit every day"...

Imeanyoufeelme?

chrystalflanders's picture

F**king Broke?

F**king Broke? PLEEEEZZZZZEE!! I will say however; they are managing the money we contributing in ways that are inappropriate and therefore getting away with it.

-Chrystal Flanders
http://www.damnyouchrystal.com

As a rider, I think both

As a rider, I think both groups leave a lot of room for improvement.

BART's management is making too much money, especially as a base salary. If they were making that much in bonuses because they were running BART very efficiently and getting high marks from riders, that would be one thing. But that's certainly not the case here.

However, its not like the line workers are a paragon of efficiency either. BartleyBoy, you're really claiming that they need to have separate people do outside groundskeeping and inside cleaning? In other words, somebody who is trained to use a mop or buffing machine can't possibly learn to use a weed wacker or trimmer? Now, if there's truly enough work that it makes sense to have people specialize in each type of work, that's one thing. But merely stating that they're separate types of work and have to be done by separate people is doing a disservice to everyone, including BART workers. I'm sure every single System Service worker and Grounds Worker is intelligent enough and capable enough to do both jobs.

And what about the fifteen minute breaks at the end of every run outlined in the SF Gate article? A fifteen minute break every few hours certainly seems reasonable. But doing five minutes of work for fifteen minutes of break (SFO<->Milbrae)? In other words, getting paid for 45 minutes of break for every 15 minutes of work? I'd love to have one of the union guys explain how the union felt that was justified. This is a case where the union should have just said 'hey, we agree that's a little over the top, so we'll waive that provision for this run only'

Southwest Airlines is widely regarded to be one of the best and most profitable airlines in the USA. It's 87% unionized, but the unions and management generally work together to find common sense solutions for everyone, and neither tries to screw the other side too badly. It isn't uncommon to see a pilot picking up trash in the cabin so a flight gets out on time. I wish that could be the case for BART, but I don't see either side budging.

Dear Dordal, I can not argue

Dear Dordal,

I can not argue with some of your logic. I know nothing about the breaks except there must be some reason things are as they are.

They could train someone to do everything. I don't know what you do but I’m sure someone else could do their job as well as yours. Someone else could do their job as well as mine, there is no doubt, but in many areas it does call for specialization. If the Electrician cleans the bathroom he still gets the Electricians rate of pay doesn't he/she?

That fact that there are two different types of workers was created by BART as a cost saving measure. There could be one worker doing both jobs and that has been the offer from the Union in the past. This Drip line issue is nothing new. A janitor who mops gets paid less than a Grounds workers who uses tools because it saves BART money. The janitor could learn those tasks but then they would not be a janitor would they? If the Electrician cleans the bathroom, is he/she not an electrician anymore? Nor would they even be available to clean the stations because they would be out doing the grounds workers job or the electricians job or the Station Agents job. They can't be everywhere at once.

Now if BART wants to hire twice as many workers to do the work it could be done but the wage is determined by the higher type of work to be done. So if the janitor should do the Grounds keepers work, he/she should get the Grounds Keepers wage.

You would not expect a surgeon to do the surgery and the Anesthesiologists job as well or the nurses job. If that were the case you would have to pay the higher rate of the Doctors wage and have three times more of them. You would have a Doctor doing the Anesthesiologists job at the Doctors rate of pay because he/she has to have those qualifications as well, or would the wage be a floating wage dropping down when the Doctor takes his hands out of the patient to hunt up a scalpel # 3 to hand himself. And if the doctor is doing all three jobs (Nurse, Anesthesiologist and Doctor) who keeps the patient alive while the Doctor is over checking the patients oxygen level instead of pinching off the Aneurysm?

Or I guess we could have a pilot acting as the pilot and the flight attendant but then when your getting your instruction on putting on your floaty, the plane flies itself unless you have two employees both qualified as pilots doing both jobs at the higher rates.

Now if your argument is that the janitor simply makes to much money, you would have a better argument. But if the janitor now has to do the janitor job and the Grounds Keepers job, you'll have a janitor that makes more than they do now. Instead of $28 per hour you would have a janitor that would get $34 per hour or whatever it is that Grounds Keeper get. A janitor doing Grounds Keepers Work is no longer a janitor. They are now a Grounds Keeper as a nurse doing the Doctors job is no longer the Nurse but becomes the Doctor.

Or we could go with the Commie bullshit and they all get the same wage. But then why would I want to go 6 to 8 years of schooling to earn the same as the janitor?

boopiejones's picture

i think the argument is that

i think the argument is that you do not need a full time janitor or a full time groundskeeper for each station. if you cut down the amount of time a janitor spends traveling from station to station for their next cleaning job, you realize efficiencies. so if the janitor takes care of 4 stations instead of 8, and performs grounds keeping duties at those four stations as well, they can spend more time actually working and less time traveling between jobs (with that travel time being PAID). if they currently spend 15 minutes of every hour traveling and you can cut that down to 15 minutes of every TWO hours, you just saved 12.5%. so you could afford to pay them a bit more and still recognize a savings.

and your doctor argument makes no sense. it's not like the groundskeeper needs to monitor the grass 24/7 and immediately cut an errant blade, lest someone will die. surgery REQUIRES a doctor, nurse and anesthesiologist. they all perform different functions during surgery.

Boopie writes, "and

Boopie writes, "and your
Submitted by BartleyBoy on Mon, 05/11/2009 - 6:41am. *new
Boopie writes,
"and your doctor argument makes no sense. it's not like the groundskeeper needs to monitor the grass 24/7 and immediately cut an errant blade, lest someone will die. surgery REQUIRES a doctor, nurse and anesthesiologist. they all perform different functions during surgery."
Finally, there is light at the end of the Transbay Tube. However, your not well informed, but that's probably not your fault.
The jobs of System Service and Grounds Keeper are distinctively different. And there is not a Janitor or Grounds Keeper monitoring the grass 24/7. There is not a janitor at every station. They handle 2 or 3 stations and travel by train from station to station. There is also not a Grounds Keeper at every station. They cover several stations and offices complexes and all the mainline right of way. They travel by truck all over the District. They also are supposed to keep the brush down so that it does not break the windshields out of the trains as it flys by and so that workers can see the train coming and that the Train Operator can see wayside workers.
The drip line issue has been well and alive for many years because Management needs an issue to focus your attention on so you won't be looking at real issues, like them wasting your tax dollars, millions of dollars at a time.
While Management pours millions down a rat hole like an Automatic Train Detection System that does not work or an automated bookkeeping system that is haywire and after $80 million dollars or so finally is told it won't work, they distract your attention to the janitor and grounds keeper. That way they hide their own incompetence by distracting you with the speck in someone else’s eyes while the beam sticking out of their own eye goes un-noticed.
$1.6 million dollars for janitorial services and grounds keepers duties sounds like a lot and is compared to what you and I make, until you hold it up alongside of the billions that run through BART creating nothing more than new billionaires and a few temporary jobs. The money spent on System service and Grounds Workers is like spitting into the Ocean thinking we can change the sea level. BART has spent more on media against salaries than they do on the salaries themselves. How much do you think it costs to get an article written by Métier and Ross? (two writers, by the way, writing one article.)
The real issues are better hid by the craft of carpet baggers who manipulate the media while they conduct the "Let's make a new billionaire."
Keep reading Boopie. But think. Why is the dripline even an issue when you yourself complain of the trains being late, hot, overcrowded and sometimes they downright stink. There are much bigger issues.
BART wants to build an Oakland Airport Connector. Not a bad idea but to expensive when compared to the existing bus transporter that creates jobs for people who drive busses. The connector will create jobs for temporary workers who come in an work and then leave while the price of getting from Oakland Coliseum is driven up from a couple bucks to another ten spot out of an already expensive transit system that s cost are not driven by the speck spent on maintenance and operations but by the waste spent on temporary construction projects that often do not work.
BART wants a new billion dollar mega complex in Oakland. BART wants a new cutting edge Operation Control Center (Central). Those things are worth billions. The new car fleet they have ordered is 1.3 billion and totally incompatible with the existing fleet or computer system. That's like designing new automobiles that can't drive on our freeways. So we'll have to re-build the freeways.
The money spent on maintenance is a drop in the proverbial bucket. The real money is on building things with "new technology" that may or may not work. Better yet, if it doesn't work, they can tear it down and build it again! The cost of one BART car will pay for the total cost of all the Grounds Keepers and all the System Service workers for years to come with enough change left over for a BBQ for all the BART Riders and Workers to get together and solve BARTs problems.

I see a necessity here to

I see a necessity here to help clarify Grounds Keeper as a skill level. Boopie assumes the Grounds Keeper just rakes leaves and trims shrubbery; something he thinks a System Service Worker can also do.

BART has a significant amount of designed landscaping at above ground stations and facilities. There are specific trees, shrubs and groundcover in specific places. Sometimes these things die or are otherwise damaged and need to be replaced or maintained.

A level of knowledge and skill that goes beyond raking leaves and trimming shrubbery is necessary to maintain this part of the infrastructure.

You take a person who is trained to know the difference between pacasandra and ice plant and has to use that knowledge today and hand them a mop and tell them to clean a station platform tomorrow, which pay grade are you going to pay them? A different one for each day for each knowledge and skill level?

BartleyBoy mentioned somewhere that Grounds Keepers drive large trucks. Above a certain size vehicle, a person needs to maintain a CDL to legally drive it. This could be an additional level of qualification that may be required of the position. Personally, I don't know how they deal with that.

At some point, if the unions don't maintain a distinction among skill levels, the situation morphs into Station Agents cleaning stations, Train Operators cleaning trains, and shop Techs and Mechanics cleaning the floors and bathrooms in the shops.

Unless you would prefer that all skill levels are considered interchangeable at say a nice efficient pay rate of $20/hour and no benefits: BART Worker. Sometimes I get the feeling that the knowitalls out there who think they have the answers to all of BART's labor issues think that would work just fine. It's all just so much low skilled grunt work to them.

As with so many other things about BART that seem so simple to those on the outside who are looking in, once you get into the details, it's not so simple.

boopiejones's picture

then i think you need to

then i think you need to differentiate between groundskeeper and arborist. pay someone janitorial type wages to do the raking and mowing. mowing is no more difficult than mopping a floor. and neither of them are brain surgery. then, when that green plant thingy in the corner is dying, hire a floral consultant to tell you if it is iceplant or pacajawea before the "grunts" apply the wrong fertilizer. just like you would hire a plumber if a toilet was clogged and the janitor was unable to clear it with a plunger. you don't pay a plumber to clean toilets. why pay an arborist to mow lawns?

if there weren't unions, people wouldn't be disputing whether or not cleaning toilets or trimming bushes is a higher paygrade. to me they should be similar paying jobs. a janitor needs to know what cleaner is for the floors, which one removes gum, which one is for the toilets. a groundskeeper needs to know what weed killer to use, which fertilizer, etc. they both require job specific knowledge, but neither is more difficult than the other.

"if there weren't unions"

"if there weren't unions" says it all. There are unions and this is the reality that you have to deal with if you want to get anything done. BART management has no legal recourse to abolish unions nor does anyone else.

Coulda, shoulda, woulda, if there weren't, all fall in the category of wishful daydreaming.

If you want to accomplish anything in this world, you start with the reality of what is and work from there.

When it comes to the "problem" of BART and unions if you perceive it that way, "if there weren't unions" are the first four words of a useless discussion.

imeanyoufeelme's picture

"If you want to accomplish

"If you want to accomplish anything in this world, you start with the reality of what is and work from there."

Exactly, start that the reality is that there are unions, then abolish them. And yes, the courts can let business out of their union contracts. Read much on the Big 3 and the UAW? Unions bankrupt business when they go beyond demanding reasonably work hours and safe work environments and start demanding absurd pay and benefits.

The recent financial problems

The recent financial problems of the auto manufacturers have more to do with the lack of availability of credit to them and the downturn in the availability of consumer credit to their customers than anything to do with the unions.

Any insinuation that the unions have single handedly bankrupted the auto manufacturers is unfounded in fact. You must be getting your news from someplace different than what I have.

If you think BART is ever going to be able to go to court to abolish the unions, then you have no concept of the actual relationship that BART has with its unions.

I observed the BART/Union relationship for 24 years from a ringside seat. Since I was not in a union, nobody can accuse me of having an overly biased opinion in favor of the unions. Having seen what positive aspects a unionized workforce brought to the place, mainly a certain minimum level of respect for the employees as humans, I doubt if I would have stuck around that long if there weren't any unions there.

For the most part, what I observed was a cordial, working relationship. Unfortunately, during contract negotiations, this relationship becomes adversarial and attempts are made to influence public opinion via "advertisement" or in some cases blatant propaganda.

The disruption to the riding public of the process of BART attempting to abolish the unions through the courts would be unfathomable. Good luck finding a judge and a court or a BART management willing to sign up for such a potentially unproductive and disruptive mess as that.

And guess what? Let's say you are successful in abolishing the unions. There's no current law that says somebody can't come in and organize BART again if the employees feel they are being mistreated.

For those of you who continue to insist that unions are some kind of pox on this country and could somehow be constructively abolished, you may not realize it but what you unconsciously desire is some form of totalitarian government.

Go to China or Russia and see how their workers are treated, then come back and tell us how that would work for you. That’s how the way you want it would eventually end up.

imeanyoufeelme's picture

You have no idea what you are

You have no idea what you are talking about. Credit or no credit availability, the Big Three are running a business with no viable long term life. The UAW has too many legacy entitlements (health care, retirement, absurd wages) for the Big 3 to continue. The Japanese and Euro companies never got into bed with the UAW, hence their continued viability.

Also, China and Russia are two completely different economies and not at all similar politically. What I am saying is not a totalitarian government, I am saying true capitalism. China, in particular, would be an instance of a Union running the whole country (some sort of weird mutant communism, socialism, with some half assed capitalism thrown in).

Ford isn't filing for

Ford isn't filing for bankruptcy, hasn't taken any bailout money and has contracts with the UAW.
The UAW has been at Ford since 1941.

So, it looks like there could be some management problems at GM and Chrysler, no?

My statement about how workers are treated in China and Russia stands alone regardless of your attempts to obfuscate it with political, economic and ideological mumbo jumbo. Those people have no viable avenue for dissent or redress of grievance the way labor unions do in this country, period.

BTW, your true, free market, unrestrained, unregulated capitalism turns into corporate, military totalitarian fascism, through a little minor detail of reality called human paranoid greed. Some people will always attempt to have all of the power, if you let them.

If you want to keep this up with your pissy, holier than thou, pseudo intellectual attitude, I can continue to make a fool out of you.

I was trying to be polite but your condescending "You have no idea what you are talking about" sort of shifted the tone of our discussion a little bit.

imeanyoufeelme's picture

"Ford isn't filing for

"Ford isn't filing for bankruptcy, hasn't taken any bailout money and has contracts with the UAW.
The UAW has been at Ford since 1941."

And Ford has been running negative revenue for how long now? Just because they haven't filed or taken bailout money, doesn't mean they are on the edge.

Your statements about China and Russia stand alone? That doesn't make sense as both countries have very different reasons that workers are treated poorly (both steaming from the wondrous horrors of a half assed attempt at communism)and shouldn't just be lumped together.

"BTW, your true, free market, unrestrained, unregulated capitalism turns into corporate, military totalitarian fascism, through a little minor detail of reality called human paranoid greed."

You do the Bay Area proud Comrade!

Your logic behind calling me

Your logic behind calling me comrade is flawed. I'm opposed to any type of totalitarian rule whether it arises from unregulated capitalism or communism. A jackboot standing on your neck is a jackboot standing on your neck.

You are naive to believe that your "true capitalism" leads to some sort of utopian free market where everyone who works hard wins and everything is all posies and sunshine.

Unchecked capitalism can lead to totalitarianism because there are always a few greedy bastards who try to take everything that isn't bolted down if you let them. My observation of this fact does not make me a communist.

My statement about the workers of China and Russia was about how they are treated, which is poorly compared to in this country. The reason isn't different from one of those countries to the other. The reason is totalitarian rule which stifles any organized dissent. You can try to twist and obfuscate the meaning of what I said all you want. It isn't working out for you.

Feel free to continue to make my case for recognizing your condescending, pseudo intellectual attitude.

boopiejones's picture

you are making the assumption

you are making the assumption that unions are necessary. I don't think they are. I don't think union=respect, nor do i think union=quality work. the only thing that i think can be directly tied to unions is unions=higher prices.

sure, there are alot of reasons why companies fail. in the case of GM and chrysler, unions are partially to blame. maybe they aren't the only thing to blame, but they are absolutely a large part of the blame and no one can dispute that.

your comment about wishful daydreaming hits the nail on the head with the problem i have with unions. i am for a free market economy. unions totally destroy that concept. how would you like it if all the toilet paper companies got together and said "everyone needs TP. lets charge $1,000 a roll" they can't legally do that, because it is collusion. or what if one TP company bought all the other TP companies and then jacked up prices. once again, they can't do that because they would be considered a monopoly. yet those are the principals that unions are founded on: collusion and monopolization

OK, back to our regularly

OK, back to our regularly scheduled discussion. Boopie, since you don't get pissy with me, I don't get pissy with you.

As far as unions=respect at BART, with me as an inside witness for 24 years, I can attest that this is accurate. I don't extrapolate that to everywhere there is a union, but I know what I saw at BART. During my career there, I dealt with a number of questionable outside equipment suppliers and contractors who appeared to have some "friends" inside BART management. Early in my career one of these arrangements ultimately resulted in me being a whistleblower with all the harassment that goes along with it. As a non-union employee, I was treated with some serious disrespect to the point of hiring a lawyer. Being in a union in that situation would have been a plus. The fact that I worked there for another 22 years afterward makes it hard for anyone to say that I was wrong to do what I did. That's my BART employee respect story.

As far as monopolies go, I pointed out elsewhere that BART is indeed a monopoly.

Public transit like BART isn't profitable because the ongoing cost to maintain the infrastructure is substantially more than you can charge in fares to pay for it. If you could abolish the unions tomorrow and pay your free market wages this would still be true. If this weren't true, plenty of private operators would be in the business and some of them would be managed well enough to be non-union. It isn't like the unions all banded together and said let's screw the transit industry out of profitability. That just isn't the reality of the situation.

As for your TP analogy, with the fact that BART is a monopoly and the unions haven't strong armed management into a $1000 base fare yet, I will concede this discussion when it gets there.

"Public transit like BART

"Public transit like BART isn't profitable..."

Looking at the operating budget tells the story of the operating deficit in terms of labor.

For the sake of illustration go to:

http://www.bart.gov/docs/FY09_Budget.pdf

I've extracted the following figures and calculated the operating deficit:

Sub-Total
Operating Revenue $355M

Labor $388M

Sub-Total
Operating Expense $559M

Operating deficit -$204M

You would have to cut the labor cost by more than 50% to break even.

Now wait... wait... before long somebody will show up and say (here I'll save you the trouble; you can just copy and paste it):

"See, see, if you just abolish the unions and fire all the management, you could get a fresh start with free market labor, save 50% on the labor cost, and BART could at least break even on the operation of the system. See?"

You want to make that work? Bring us some details. Otherwise you are offering unsubstantiated economic voodoo.

boopiejones's picture

http://www.bart.gov/docs/FY20

http://www.bart.gov/docs/FY2008_financials.pdf

after accounting for tax income, bart lost "only" $31 million in 2008 and $16 million in 2007. they don't break labor out specifically in the income statement and i am too lazy to read the notes right now, but if i may take your $388 million labor figure from the 2009 budget as a baseline, they'd only need to cut that by 8% to be break even. i can virtually guarantee you that if there wasn't a union involved the total labor/benefits package would average at least 8% less.

I was referring to the gap

I was referring to the gap between operating revenue and operating cost shown in the FY 09 budget. This gap is $204M.

To close that gap by cutting the labor budget of $388M yields a labor budget of $184M or less than 50% of what it is now if you want to pay to operate the system from only operating revenue, all else being equal.

This doesn't include any capital expenditure or outside sources of income like sales tax.

I did this to show what it would take for BART to operate WITHOUT any subsidies like sales tax and excluding consideration of any capital improvements.

Nobody is ever going to turn a profit with it is my point.

boopiejones's picture

right, but you can't ignore

right, but you can't ignore the taxes because they are a real and basically guaranteed revenue stream. all bart needs to do is find $30 million a year somewhere and they will break even. you already know where i think that money should come from.

as a side note, i didn't realize how totally stupid some of the labor rules were until reading an article this evening. there are separate inside and outside janitors at bart. janitors. not groundskeepers. so if there is gum on the platform, that is one janitors job to clean it up. if there is gum on the sidewalk, that is another janitors job. heck, if there is a sidewalk that is partially covered by the station roof and there are two pieces of gum on that sidewalk, one under the roof dripline and another just beyond it, bart is required BY THE UNION to send two different janitors to clean it up. insane. what they need to do is have ONE janitor job. you are a janitor. you clean everything you see that is dirty. that is your JOB!!! and when you are done cleaning that one station inside and out, get on a train and head to the next station. while you are on that train, guess what? CLEAN IT TOO!!! you can still have two breaks and a lunch for every 8 hours worked. i am all for that. but clean shit! geez.

unions require a 15 minute break after EVERY SINGLE RUN by a TO. doesn't matter if that run is baypoint to millbrae or sfo to millbrae. 15 minute break. INSANE!!! now, obviously TOs need breaks. i wouldn't want to get on a train/plane/bus where the driver hadn't had a break in 6 hours. but a 5 minute run for a 15 minute break? that is unions flexing their muscle and overstepping their boundaries.

it is little issues like those that add up to bart running at a deficit. those same issues raise fares for all of us. those same issues make me hate unions.

The drip line janitor story

The drip line janitor story is trotted out every four years at contract time. It's a worn out distraction. Matier and Ross must have had their budget cut. There's much bigger budgetary fish to fry than that on both sides.

I don't come here to air the details of BART's dirty laundry because then I would be accused of being anti-BART or having an axe to grind, neither of which is true. Any of the problems I encountered there over the years were due to individuals with the wrong agenda rather than BART as an entity.

But I will tell you as a long time insider that no way, no how can all of BART's deficit problems be blamed on the union.
I saw plenty of money going down the toilet over the years that had nothing to do with the unions.

You will see this play out in the coming weeks as the contract deadline approaches if the news media intends to accurately report the truth. Every pissing contest has two sides, neither of which comes out squeaky clean.

I'm sure every single System

I'm sure every single System Service worker and Grounds Worker is intelligent enough and capable enough to do both jobs.

If you add the outside grounds, weed trimming, plant watering, cleaning up broken glass in the parking lots, etc. to those responsibilities it's not possible for one person to finish that much work in a day.

And what about the fifteen minute breaks at the end of every run outlined in the SF Gate article? A fifteen minute break every few hours certainly seems reasonable.

Not just reasonable--but California law. For EVERYONE. Not just BART employees. I agree 15 minutes after 5 minutes is ridiculous. The T.O.'s are doing a lot of stuff that you don't see. It's not like they just climb into a pre-assembled train and sit there for two hours then get out and have a break. The trains have to be put together, in the proper order, walked through, etc.

imeanyoufeelme's picture

"the situation morphs into

"the situation morphs into Station Agents cleaning stations, Train Operators cleaning trains, and shop Techs and Mechanics cleaning the floors and bathrooms in the shops."

And what is so wrong with this? The "not my job" mentality is the base of Union problems. Should it take up the majority of their day? No way. But can the station agent at MacArthur station clean up the smeared food off the top of one of the turnstiles? Sure. Will she? Nope, not her job!

I haven't been shy about

I haven't been shy about relating my experiences from working at BART to the point that anybody who knew me when I was there will probably recognize who I am by what I post. And don't that think I looked the other way and kept my mouth shut about anything while I was there either.

I was thinking of posters like imeanyoufeelme when I wrote the last two paragraphs of my post.

"Unless you would prefer that all skill levels are considered interchangeable at say a nice efficient pay rate of $20/hour and no benefits: BART Worker. Sometimes I get the feeling that the knowitalls out there who think they have the answers to all of BART's labor issues think that would work just fine. It's all just so much low skilled grunt work to them.

As with so many other things about BART that seem so simple to those on the outside who are looking in, once you get into the details, it's not so simple."

Why don't you tell us what you do for a living that makes you such an expert on what would be the best labor practices at BART?

imeanyoufeelme's picture

I have a Ph.D. in the Best

I have a Ph.D. in the Best Labor Practices at BART. Weird how that works out. Don't ask stupid questions.

All we can do is relate to what we see at BART. What I see is a system that is acceptable, but could be excellent. I think the vast majority of BART employees do a good job. However, I think that there are some very obvious problems within BART (management, unions, flawed design, rude riders) that cause rage.... BARTRage.

[quote]All we can do is

[quote]All we can do is relate to what we see at BART.[/quote]

And I think you should be generally pleased with what you see. 40-year old aluminum trains well past their recommended lifespan are being kept running 16 hours a day with only a few delays here and there, most under 5 minutes, by 2,900 employees (down from 3,200). With 370,000 riders a day, that's a ratio of about one employee for every 128 riders.

Also, for every "overpaid" employee management trots out at negotiations, there are many underpaid ones as well because the 0-2% raises employees get don't keep up with market rates for a LOT of jobs that require highly specialized skills and/or a college degree.

Yes, the economy is bad now, but every four years at negotiations the economy is always bad at BART then, a few months later, there's plenty of money suddenly "found" for management and executive raises that are far above 0 or 2%.

Dear Imeanyoufellme, The

Dear Imeanyoufellme,

The problem with Station Agents cleaning stations & Train Operators cleaning trains, and shop Techs and Mechanics cleaning the floors and bathrooms in the shops is that when they are doing theses things they aren't doing the jobs they were hired to do.

Those things are all possible but when the Station Agent is cleaning the Bathroom who’s minding the Station? Your not seeing that it is all like a puzzle and has to fit together just right to work.

A Train operator can't just clean the train when he/she wants. They drive the train and maintain safety. At the end of their runs they may have time but the train goes right back out with a new driver. An EOL (End of Line Cleaner) runs through the train picking up newspapers while the operator is setting up the train for the next trip. The train actually gets cleaned late at night when the operators are setting up for their runs or jostling cars around in the yard putting trains together.

Most of these activities happen fast so that train can get back out. Shall we pull the mechanic off the air conditioning job he is doing so he can get that car back out on the line before it gets hot so he can buff the floors and dump the trash?

If we go to one craft does everything the maintenance will suffer even more. Most of the fires and breakdowns are due to neglect now because there are not parts or enough workers. Every section at BART is running at about 2/3 staff to do the job that needs to be done. I for one choose to be a Technician not a janitor. Not that I am above that work. It is all work when you get down to it. But I chose my profession and that is what I want to do. If I have to trim the hedge, clean the bathroom, do my own job and change the lights I'll simply quit and go work some where else.

My employer owes me no more than the job I agreed to do for the benefits that we agreed to in our contract. In return I agreed to do my job. Bart is not the best job around. That is why we are understaffed. They don't pay enough to fill many jobs and the hours and days off suck. So if I have to do 4 or 5 jobs it's not worth it and I can and will leave.

Not everyone is willing to work in a substation with 34,500 volts staring you in the face. Bart is not willing to let just anyone do that ether. It cost a lot to burn down Hayward Yard so they need qualified people to do many of these jobs. BART is using a $28 Gardner to try to convince you that we are so overpaid that we should have one craft doing everything. If it goes the way you say that $28 System Service Worker will become a $40 per hour Mechanic or Technician. Do we want a $40 per hour air conditioning mechanic doing the floors? Not everyone is willing to work wayside while trains pass within inches of you at 80 miles per hour.

imeanyoufeelme's picture

good points. I guess my rage

good points. I guess my rage centers on the station agents who are, for the most part, the most unhelpful of all BART employees.

Comment Cards and barts

Comment Cards and barts website. I hear they look into most complaints about whatever reason you may have.

uh, i guess you heard wrong.

uh, i guess you heard wrong. in actual fact, they either (1) ignore your comment/complaint/question, or (2) try to tell you that there is either (a) no problem, or (b) nothing that BART can do about it.

> The new car fleet they have

> The new car fleet they have ordered is 1.3 billion and totally incompatible with the existing fleet or computer system.

Yes, it's called progress. More features that make the passenger experience better, make the trains more reliable, easier and quicker to troubleshoot and able to operate closer together.

Cars don't have to be compatible with every other car, they just have to be compatible with the other 9 cars in that train.