Looking for other victims or witnesses to slip and fall injuries at BART
On Friday, March 30, 2007, after exiting a train at Embarcadero, I slipped in a puddle of spilled coffee, went flying, and slammed my head into the platform. The puddle wasn’t visible because many others were also exiting the train.
I was unable to focus my vision for almost an hour and, over 8 months later, I’m still having pains around the brow bone above my eye, which is what hit the platform. My doctor thinks I may have fractured my brow bone. I’m seeing another doctor on Monday, and potentially might have to have an MRI to find out why it’s still hurting and why my eye is still bulging out slightly.
I submitted a claim to BART to reimburse me for my medical expenses and time off from work, and THE CLAIM HAS BEEN REJECTED. I have about 4 months left to do something about it.
I’m looking for others who have had slip and fall injuries at BART, or anyone who remembers seeing someone spill the coffee, or saw the puddle of spilled coffee and a white plastic lid on that morning. I fell at approximately 9:25 a.m., so it would have been spilled sometime earlier that morning. If I can prove the spill was there for quite some time, it might help. The spill was between the platform edge and the bottom of the escalator, near the first car of the westbound train.
I'm not sure if it's okay for me to include my email address or phone number with this posting, so if you do remember anything about the spill, would you please leave a comment and I'll check periodically? Thank you very much.

So... it was too crowded to
So...
it was too crowded to see the "puddle" / floor yet you were not near enough to anyone to slow your "fall".
Personally I do not think you can blame BART for a coffee spill like that. How do you know it was not spilled 2 minutes before?
Do you think BART should have someone there to run in and clean it up with in 30 Sec? And if so :
Do you expect BART is to stop the approaching train till it was cleaned up or something?
Let me guess, you don't have medical coverage ?
I blame BART because it does
I blame BART because it does nothing to police it's own No Food or Liquids policy. And yes, I do have medical coverage with a wonderful $1700 deductible. My eye is still bulging out slightly from this injury. Not exactly fun. I have 4 witnesses, including a woman who was coming down the escalator, so she had an aerial view. She doesn't seem to think it's my fault. One of the other witnesses was also exiting the train and he said he didn't see the spill either. And I had flat, rubber, waffle soled boots on.
Your little nickname pretty much says it all, doesn't it? Maybe someday something similar will happen to you and you'll learn to be a little bit more compassionate.
Elaine
(No subject)
similar things have happened
similar things have happened to me and that is why I have full medical coverage a reasonable deductible (for me and my family)
Dear Evil Pete, I guess it
Dear Evil Pete,
I guess it would have been better if there had been someone near enough to break my fall. I certainly wish there had been. And, in breaking my fall, maybe they would have fallen off the platform onto the tracks in front of an oncoming train. Would you have liked that better???
Let me guess. You're probably one of the riders who drinks liquids on BART, right? And, I'm guessing you're also the type who, if you spilled something, probably wouldn't bother trying to find some paper to put over it or reporting it to the BART agent. Am I right again? Since my injury, I've seen at least 7 or 8 spills on the platforms. And I have covered them with newspaper and reported them to the agent because, unlike you, I'd hate to have someone else get injured like I did. I guess you feel that if some blind or elderly person, or some pregnant woman slips in a spill and injures themselves, it's just their tough luck, isn't it?
Elaine
you make a lot of
you make a lot of assumptions
and sadly all of them are invalid..
Had you have taken the time to look at my past posting on this site you would know my position on food and drink on BART.
Did you contact an agent
Did you contact an agent when it happened, SakantaRunningWolf?
One of the 4 witnesses went
One of the 4 witnesses went and got a BART agent, and the agent called the paramedics.
Elaine
you got a (Agent's) report,
you got a (Agent's) report, witnesses.... Sue BART they'll settle as they always do, send us a postcard from Hawaii.
-T/O
You can have a herd of slip
You can have a herd of slip and fall victims step forward and attest to whatever they claim to be BART's fault. Are you seeking a class action suit? You've already provided enough information that your accident was unavoidable - you didn't see the spill, it was crowded and others either step on it and didn't slip.
Having a sealed cup of coffee on BART doesn't make BART negligent. If the coffee spilled while off-boarding, it was the passenger's fault. Would it have been reasonable for a BART custodian to be standing on the platform ready to sweep/mob up after each off-load? No. It isn't a crime for people to bring their lunch, drinks or other consumables onto BART, nor would it be reasonable to "police" each station, train or platform for eating, drinking and smoking 100% of the time.
Consider yourself lucky that you have medical insurance. The $1700 deductible was a decision you made for the cost of having medical coverage. Based on your version here, you have a lousy case. You didn't help yourself with some critical admissions, which I'm sure, someone on this blog has forwarded to BART's insurance and legal counsel.
If you are claiming that your brow and eyes might be bulging after 9 months, you might be negligent yourself for allowing this condition to linger for so long. Your case is against gravity and the coefficient of friction of vertical and lateral forces.
BTW - the only one who may have remembered the events of that day at about 9:25AM is someone named Scatdog or was it Scatwolf.
OMG, I was getting off the
OMG, I was getting off the train, not paying attention, and the dude in front of me spilled his coffee and I slipped and fell. Can you people help me find a way to blame this on BART so I can get some money.
Sorry for your injury, but trying to blame this on BART is just sad.
By the way, on the few occasions that I have slipped on a flat surface and when I have witnessed someone slip on a flat surface, I have noticed that you usually end up on your butt or back. How is it that you fell forward and hit your eye? Were you running?
Sad.. Accident (see
Sad.. Accident (see definition) happend, someone has a high deductable.. Looking for someone to blame.. I'm sorry for your continued pain, but BART is not the evil that put it there.. Also, do you believe someone will remember a cup of coffee on the ground back in March? I actuall saw coffee being dropped today, on a train, on the carpet.
I hope there is much more to the story than what she said. I really dont see where BART was negligent from the little that was said so far.. It does seem more like she has a bill to pay and wants to extort BART for something that another person did. And the fact there is lasting pain does not make BART more liable.
I hope not though... But it is all to common..
Now, if you can prove, that someone notified a BART person of the spill, and they ignored the report, therefor creating a hazardous condition. Then you may have a case..
i was going to say that same
i was going to say that same thing about falling backwards. the only time i have ever fallen forward or seen anyone else fall forward was because they tripped, not slipped. when you slip, your feet go forward and out from under the rest of your body, so you should land on your butt or back.
plus, it is a natural reaction to put your hands out when you fall. in fact, it is so natural of a reaction that people who fall a lot for a living (like mountain bikers) must learn to fall without using their hands and arms so they don't break an arm/hand/wrist/collarbone during a crash. they let their torsos take the beating and their helmet protect their heads. where were your hands during this fall?
lastly, and not to give you any ideas, but i dont think you have a case against bart unless you can prove that a bart employee was the one that spilled the coffee.
I drink tea.
I drink tea.
Sorry about your injuries,
Sorry about your injuries, but hey, its not BARTS fault. Take responsibility for your own actions. There are always going to be spilt things, trip hazards and things to bump your head on. You are not in you mommie's womb anymore. Be aware of your surroundings and watch where you're going - that is the lesson you can take home from this - as opposed to looking for someone to blame.
Dear Elaine... Please stfu
Dear Elaine...
Please stfu already with your greedy cry baby attitude. No one on here wants to hear it, we do get a good laugh, but its really pointless. You post this outrageous blog about how "negligent" BART is because you were the only careless idiot that slipped in coffee. And when someone (evil pete) responded to your rant, you got nasty and blasted them. Which is mainly why im showing absolutely NO compassion for you. Slip and fall injuries happen all the time, if you were top side and slipped in a puddle on the side walk would you sue S.F.? or the concrete company that poured the concrete sidewalk because the ground wasnt slip resistant? or better yet, another frivalous law suit against the coffee maker because its their fault you slipped in their product? How about the person that spilled their coffee? I didnt think so, Im sure you will probably respond by saying you would because thats the kind of person i think you are, but if you were the one that spilled their coffee or liquid on a BART platform, would you stop to go get napkins to clean it up? and if someone tried suing you, im sure youd be on here crying about that too. ITS NOT BARTs FAULT! If you tripped over an object protruding from the ground or some other kind of structural hazard, you might have a valid law suit. But unfortunately for you... I dont think you hve a leg to stand on with your whining...
Was there a BART Police report taken when you were injured?
It's probably stupid of me
It's probably stupid of me to bother responding because it'll probably make you go off the deep end again. Your response is a good indication of not only what type of person you are, but also your complete lack of humanity. I'm amazed at how vicious you are, and actually feel sorry for you.
If I slipped on a sidewalk because someone had spilled something, I wouldn't sue SF. When you're walking on sidewalks, you know to look for things like that. You don't expect spills on BART platforms because BART supposedly has a policy that doesn't allow eating and drinking. And, because I am the type of person who would wipe up anything I spilled (because I do think of how my actions affect others), I naively assumed anyone would, so it never occurred to me that I should be looking for spills when I was exiting a BART train.
I'm guessing you can't fathom me being the type of person who would wipe up my own spill because you're not the type who would. It's probably not within your realm of thinking or being. I'm the type of person who always asks anyone looking at a map if they need help. I carry the BART Transit Connections brochure in my purse, so I can give it to visitors who don't have a decent map. I've even walked out of my way to show visitors where something is. If someone's car is stalled, I always offer to help push the car. I clean up and sometimes fix clothing and things that people leave on the street, and then either give the clothing to homeless people or list things on Freecycle.org so they don't end up in some landfill. Do you do things like that?
I guess if I'd been looking at the ground to make sure I didn't slip in any spill, and, if someone took their bike up the escalator and accidentally dropped it and it came down and hit me, you'd be berating me for not looking up, right?
Elaine
Who is your lawyer? We need
Who is your lawyer? We need to tell them how you are interfering with your case.
i think the issue most
i think the issue most people have is that it isn't bart's fault. just like it isn't bart's fault if someone drops their bike down the escalator and it hits you, it is not bart's fault if someone spills their coffee on the platform. it could only become bart's fault if bart was notified about the spill and purposely choose not to do anything about it. that coffee could have been spilled five seconds before you slipped, by someone toward the front of the herd exiting your car for all you know.
and just because something is illegal doesn't make it bart's fault either. if someone runs a red light and hits a pedestrian, who is at fault? the driver of the car or the city? it's illegal to run red lights. based on your logic it should be the city's fault because they didn't have a police officer stationed at that light busting every single violator.
Don't you think that laws
Don't you think that laws and policies have to have consequences in order for people to obey them? There are those who, if they were never punished for breaking the law, would go ahead and do whatever they wanted to do.
Laws and policies do have
Laws and policies do have consequences. I don't know where or when you saw this, but eating/drinking on BART is illegal but is not a flat $222 fine. Fines can vary from the mid-$100s to $250. It all depends on the city and county you are in. That is usually a stiff enough to get offenders to not repeat their infraction. But as has been said many many times, it is impossible for BART Police to enforce the law 100% of the time, as BPD is not everywhere, at all times.
I hope you know that BART management are one of our most frequent visitors to this site. They could very well download all of this to a printer and use it against you if your case goes to court. Just be careful about what you write online.
as shrapnel pointed out,
as shrapnel pointed out, laws do have consequences. but there are not enough police in the world to bust every person who is breaking the law. next time you drive down the freeway, notice how many people are speeding. look at your own speedometer for that matter. you'd need about 100 CHP per mile of freeway to round up even half the speeders.
is there a consequence for speeding? sure there is - a hefty ticket and possibly increased insurance rates. but do people still speed and not get caught? absolutely. has anyone ever died because someone else's speeding car hit them? you bet. was is the state's fault that the CHP didn't bust the driver for speeding? nope.
bottom line is you can't bust every little person for every little (or big) infraction. there just aren't enough officers on the force or hours in the day.
If this is indication of
If this is indication of trial by a jury of your peers... You won't do too well in court. These people on this site I have found (for the most part) to be sensible, not biased in BART's favor (this is BART Rage, after all) and pretty in touch with society.
Any they can see right through your crap, and BART isn't even here defending themselves yet! Just imagine how you will do in court, when BART's legal team gets a chance to dig into your story.
Good luck, and I agree with registereduser... You won't find any sympathy here - your vicious attack against Evil Pete's response to your OP caused you to lose any credibility you may have had.
Buh-bye.
You gotta love human nature.
You gotta love human nature. I don't know if this person is bogus or not but the lack of concern is kind of amusing when you consider how the world comes to an end when a regular poster here gets a parking ticket, or sees some pee on the platform, or are inconvenienced by BART collecting money from ticket machines, etc. If something like that can send a person over the moon, you can believe that if anyone here fell on their butt in a BART station it would NOT be their fault.
I kinda doubt that. If one
I kinda doubt that. If one of our regulars, say Rafa, TreoBART, or boopiejones, posted a similar account, I'd grill them and question their motive as well.
You see, this person has stated that she wants money. She is looking for others to come forward and help her extort even more money from BART. Whatever her motives, wheather or not it took place or not, the fact still remains that people need to accept some personal responsibility for their own actions.
No report was taken by a BART Police Officer, and I'm not sure if the Station Agent filled out an UIR report. In any event, it's still wrong to come on here blabbing about ongoing or future litigation. You've gotta realize, Elaine, that we at BARTRage (for the most part...) are sensible, reasonable, and can see the whole picture. We are not a bunch of slip and fall artists.
Time to move elsewhere.
Do any of you BART employees
Do any of you BART employees out there have any way to check and see if there was indeed such a reported incident (requiring paramedics, as Sakanta/Elaine states) on March 30, 2007?
As was stated previously...
As was stated previously... an UIR might have been filed, but no BART Police report was filed.
Call 510-464-7032
Ok people, first of all I
Ok people, first of all I too am disgusted by the litigious society we've created for ourselves, but I find your basic lack of compassion utterly repulsive. I'm not saying I agree with Elaine, but for those of you slinging your nasty-grams you need to know that it IS the property owner's responsibility for your safety.
Of the postings I've read I saw nothing but Elaine asking for assistance in finding witnesses and defending herself against Pete's aspersion; suggesting she had no insurance, quickly followed by a string of derogatory, inflammatory, nasty replies suggesting this is a frivolous lawsuit. Frivolous is spilling coffee on oneself and suing that you got burned. Potentially legitimate is when you can show a business owner was aware of a dangerous situation (spilled coffee on the floor) and didn't do anything about it in a reasonable amount of time.
Taken from any number of law sites. Just take your pick. Google "wet floor fall law" or any reasonable variety: "If you are on someone else's property and you injure yourself as a result of a dangerous condition on the property, the land owner or business proprietor may be liable for your injuries."
Don't sit there and tell me that if YOU slipped and fell while shopping, cracking your head on the ground and suffering an injury you wouldn't want the store to do the right thing and cover your medical expenses if you felt they were negligent.
The onus is on Elaine to prove that BART knew there was a spill, the spill caused the fall, and that she suffered injury from said fall.
And registereduser? Yeah, if someone slips or trips and falls on a sidewalk due to a dangerous condition, that either the city or a shop is responsible for maintaining, they could be held liable. Nice attitude btw. Hypocrisy at work. You point out that Elaine got nasty with Pete (when he'd already cast aspersions on her) and then turn around and tell her to, and I quote, "stfu with your greedy cry baby attitude", and called her a "careless idiot". A lot of anger there for someone who thinks others should "stfu". And just so you know - "an object protruding from the ground or some other kind of structural hazard" would be a "trip and fall", a separate but similar type of injury.
I thought I'd found a good site where I could commiserate over a common source of frustration (BART), but now I see it's just a board populated by trolls like most others out there.
Hey, Spice. Not really
Hey, Spice.
Not really related to your post, but just wondering... did my co-worker tell you about this site? I was on the phone with him a while ago and he said he was talking to someone about BART Rage... a passenger, perhaps. Just wondering if he referred you here, and if not, has that individual who he referred to this site registered? If so, who are you (username)?
Nope, not me :) I stumbled
Nope, not me :) I stumbled on the site accidentally.
How did you find this site?
How did you find this site? Googled BART?
Vanity. Sheer vanity.
Vanity. Sheer vanity. :)
I think I was looking at my blog logs - checking out referring URLs and one was from a Google search, so I followed it to see what else came up in the result set, and voila! there was BARTRage.
Ah, I see. Say it proud! I
Ah, I see. Say it proud! I just got done Googling myself....
I must say, there are a lot
I must say, there are a lot of hits for "shrapnel" ;)
Dear Spice, First of all,
Dear Spice,
First of all, thank you so much for coming to my defense. I was really blown away at how vicious the responses to my posting were. I realize trying to find a witness is a long shot after all this time, but I decided to try, just in case. There's always that small possibility that someone who takes the same train and rides in the same car everyday, might have witnessed the coffee being spilled or might remember seeing the spill. I also met a woman on BART who slipped and fell (again, on a BART platform) and broke her tailbone. She told me she continues to have medical problems because of it. BART also rejected her claim. I didn't think to get her phone number at the time, so I was sort of hoping she might see and respond to my posting. (If I were litigious, I obviously would have made sure I got her contact info at the time.)
It's kind of hard to keep track of who made what comments, but I wanted to try to address some of them. I was not running. And, as I said, I had flat, rubber, waffle-soled boots on. I suspect I may have stepped on the plastic coffee lid in the puddle, which may have acted like a mini-skateboard and caused me to sort of fly through the air and land on my face. (Even though I honestly could not focus my vision for almost an hour after the injury, I was able to look back and see the plastic lid in the puddle.) I wish I had fallen on my ass, in which case, I probably wouldn't be writing this now. It truly happened so quickly that I didn't have time to brace myself. I did have also a large bruise on my right knee, however. And, there was a BART police report taken by Officer Jeffrey Zwetsloot. I think someone said there wasn't a report taken, and I don't understand why they would lie about that. Anyway, I hoped the swelling would go down and it would just heal, so I didn't do anything at the time because I am not a litigious person. (I slipped and fell on a wet spill at Safeway one time, but I wasn't injured and so didn't try to pursue any type of claim.) If I was a litigious person, I definitely would have had the paramedics take me to the emergency room.
I never expected anything like this would happen to me, but it's made me acutely aware of how dangerous a spill can be. Everything that could have gone wrong, went wrong. So, as I said, I've been covering up every spill I see on BART platforms and immediately reporting them to the agent. I don't want anyone else to have to go through what I've been going through. I really think someday someone else is going to be injured even more seriously. I wish some of the other people who responded so viciously would try to imagine how they would feel if it happened to them.
In the probably 25 years I've been riding BART, I personally have never seen a citation being issued (as one of the other replies claimed). Maybe I've just been on the wrong trains. But, I am sick of seeing orange peels and sunflower seed shells on the trains, not to mention coffee spills on the seats and floor. The most important thing I want to come out of this is to get BART to start enforcing their policy. I've been observing riders entering and exiting the stations with coffee and counted 43 in a 48 minute period at Downtown Berkeley the other day. They all walked within 10 feet of the agents' booth and, if fact, one of the agents was standing there talking to another BART employee. They didn't stop anyone. I also counted 28 in a 20 minute period at Embarcadero. I drink my coffee at home before I leave for work, and I take a thermos with me so I can drink it when I get to work. Is it really that important for these people to have their coffee on the train?
I think I remember seeing large signs on the trains a couple of decades ago and they said there was a $222 fine for eating and/or drinking on BART. If those signs were still up, I don't think there would be as many riders blatantly drinking coffee on the trains. Also, I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but Peet's Coffee is going to open kiosks at 6 BART stations next year. I'm sure BART doesn't want to honor my claim for reimbursement of medical expenses because it certainly wouldn't look good for their partnership with Peet's.
I'm sure this reply will generate a whole new barrage of hateful comments from other readers, but I hope they'll take into consideration that they do not know what type of person I am, and that there is a possibility they could be wrong about me.
Thanks again,
Elaine
I couldn't agree more to
I couldn't agree more to many of your points and I'm sorry I didn't respond earlier...
I feel very strongly that this country needs serious tort reform and protections from frivolous lawsuits... and I might even argue that slipping on coffee while exiting a train may be one of those tough s*^& issues we all deal with in life.
But- you still empathize with the person who injured themselves (only after uhh you know- you stop laughing)
There was a lot of nastiness to the post (or three) about the alleged incident. I don't know if this was from the past troller (Sanka whatever)... but yeah I also felt the chil in the room that is only brought on by the fiercly armed with keyboard and mouse.
Thank you. I couldn't agree
Thank you. I couldn't agree more to your agreeing more... or less.
This country is out of control with all the frivolous lawsuits. I think I recently saw a site devoted to the most amusing (worst?) CYA statements made to avoid a lawsuit (i.e. "caution: coffee may be hot" kinda stuff).
On a side note, what IS it about slapstick... someone falling, tripping, slipping, splitting their head open like a ripe melon... that causes laughter to be the gut reaction? I know there are some who immediately get all concerned and rush over "are you ok? OMG are you ok?" while the rest of us fall over laughing before getting up and seeing if they're ok.
Love your turn of phrase btw, "...that is only brought on by the fiercely armed with keyboard and mouse".
can't remember where i read
can't remember where i read this, but "laughter" is a natural reaction to someone getting injured. it has something to do with our nervous reaction to threatening situations being to show our teeth, which stems from way back in the evolutionary chain. what do animals do when they feel threatened? they growl and show their teeth. this is the same reason why yawns are "contageous" - you see someone else yawning (showing their teeth) and it triggers you to do the same. i know this sounds like a bunch of BS, but i really read it somewhere.
It rings a bell, I'm sure
It rings a bell, I'm sure I've heard the same thing, but why laughter?
We usually associate laughter with happiness or something funny, but there's obviously something more primal about it, but what? What purpose does this reaction serve as opposed to another?
Does the good feeling you get reassure your body somehow, telling it it doesn't need to prepare for fight or flight whilest baring your teeth is a holdover from days when we'd bare them when threatened (maybe part of us thinks something attacked the other person and we're preparing to be its next target)?
And if that's laughter's base purpose, does the fact that we laugh at jokes and other forms of entertainment mean the purpose has been either corrupted or has evolved?
Good grief I think I put MYSELF to sleep.
Well, get this
Well, get this everyone.
This morning, a guy was off-boarding a Fremont train at MacArthur, and in his rush to get over to the Daly City train, he tripped over one of those big concrete sitting devices. Landed on his head. Heard a crack. I rushed over, radio at the ready, and offered to call fire/rescue. He got up, looked around, said "no, I'm fine" dusted his jacket off, and proceeded to the Daly City train.
I confirmed that he was fine, and he looked at me and said "If it still hurts when I get to work, I'll make a doctor's appointment." I told him that he should get checked out in case it turned out to be serious, because EMS should be called for liability perposes. He looked at me, and said with a chuckle, "I won't sue BART. Sometimes, shit happens."
That made my morning.
"Heard a crack." ouch...
"Heard a crack."
ouch... made me shiver just thinking about it.
Nice to know not everyone's thinking "lawsuit", but I still don't blame Elaine for trying to recoup costs.
I blame people for trying to
I blame people for trying to recoup costs from people that are not at fault.
At the very least, anyone that brings a lawsuit should pay all court/time costs of the victim of the lawsuit (the one being sued) if the lawsuit is unjustified.
If it is a legitimate claim, then by all means sue.. But if someones case is weak at best, maybe paying the defense lawyers will make people think twice before they sue.
Sounded like the problem Elayne had was she didn't have the money... Not that BART was actually negligent of some wrongdoing .. She never proved BART was at fault.
I agree. And in some cases
I agree. And in some cases I do believe they ARE made to pay court costs if they lose, but I'm no lawyer so I'm not positive.
The trouble there, and I hate to stereotype, but oftentimes frivolous lawsuits are brought about by people who don't have money and wouldn't be able to pay court costs if they lost anyway. Can't get blood from a stone.
However, proving BART was at fault was what she was doing here. She was looking for witnesses to strengthen her case. And I don't think it was a matter of not having the money. Who wants to plunk down a sizable deductible to pay for medical expenses, not to mention suffer continuing medical problems, that may have been attributed to negligence? She didn't come in here panhandling after all, she came in looking for witnesses to an accident.
This group could very easily have simply said "sorry, I wasn't there that day" or "if you haven't already you should consult with a lawyer. I'm pretty sure the hurdle you face here is proving negligence" or even "check with BART central (or whomever) to see if any reports were filed". But instead this person was met with open hostility.
a losing plaintiff should
a losing plaintiff should ALWAYS be required to pay all costs associated with the defendant defending themselves (and vice-versa). that is the only way to make people think twice before filing a frivolous lawsuit or on the flip side, forcing a plaintiff to sue to get what was rightfully theirs in the first place. i don't know what the law states, but it's the only fair way - the loser should always pay all the winners costs - whether they can afford it or not.
i am still trying to figure out where elaine's hands were as she was hurtling toward the floor. i asked the question earlier but elaine vanished before she answered. my guess is that she is leaving something out of her story - she was on her cell phone, fiddling with her ipod, etc. i have occasionally missed a step on my way up or down the stairs and my hands automatically grab for the rail, before i can even realize what the hell is happening.
Yep yep, like you guys
Yep yep, like you guys stated earlier, it's like an automatic reaction, you start to fall, your hands shoot out. That's why there's so many wrist-related injuries. Natural reaction.
Even if there was a reason for falling forward (she was leaning that way? her toes shot out from under her, not her heels?) you'd most likely land on your knees. Although I suppose she could have skidded out sideways where the hands are less effective in bracing for a fall. She could have been looking at the ground racing up at her and when she hit the momentum caused her head to crack the ground...? We could all put forth our JFK theories but only Elaine knows the details.
She didn't completely
She didn't completely vanish, as I saw her online when I logged in today. Perhaps she is being wise and not discussing the details so it can't be used against her in court if it goes that far...
And for the record, I'm sorry you got hurt Elaine and I hope you manage to get through the hell that is our legal system in one piece.
-----------------------
There is no "U" in BART
Thanks for not crucifying me
Thanks for not crucifying me like so many others did. Wow. Because it was my first posting and I wasn't asking for opinions, I was pretty blown away by the very ugly, vicious responses. It's pretty weird to be called a whining cry baby, especially considering that I was raped by two men at knifepoint for 4 hours when I was 20 years old, and considered myself just lucky not to have been killed. I actually thought it was better that it happened to me instead of some 15 year old who would have freaked out and probably would have been killed. I kind of figure that gives me non-crybaby status.
Elaine
I only wish I had put my
I only wish I had put my hands out. Actually, what I really wish is that it had never happened at all. As I explained in an earlier reply to Spice, it happened in a split second. I'd much rather be dealing with a broken wrist than a protruding eye and continued pain around my eye socket. I've never had a cell phone and wasn't fiddling with my iPod either. If I had a video of what happened to show all of you, I don't think my unsolicited critics would be as harsh as they've been. I wasn't asking to be judged. I was only asking for witnesses or other people who had similar injuries.
Elaine
Dayuummm... Yes S(^*
Dayuummm... Yes S(^* happens
They usually trip over me when transferring from Fremont to Frisco
Godspeed to him
MacArthur is dangerous :)... (although my favorite station)... I danged near broke my foot (while ummm transferring from a Fremont train) going down the stairs... I missed a step... my foot was mighty painful for two weeks... Not BART's fault.
FWIW, I favor stricter
FWIW, I favor stricter enforcement of the no eating and drinking rule. At the same time, I still think it's two-faced when you look at CalTrain (no problem) and Amtrak (sold onboard). Of course, I once sat in a beer-soaked seat on Amtrak. It was dark. It taught me to feel seats before planting myself on them. :)
I have never seen anyone get cited for eating/drinking.
To you folks who think agents should be enforcers of this policy, the best they could do is make an announcement most people would ignore. The function of agents in the context of system rules is to inform, not enforce. Enforcement is a police duty. Police are armed. Agents are not.